Realtime AI News
Nvidia, Palantir pull back from Anthropic over data fears
Nvidia and Palantir have pulled back from Anthropic over concerns about data, according to a Benzinga report. The report is thin on specifics and does not say how far the withdrawal goes, but it points to data governance as an increasingly decisive factor in AI supply-chain partnerships.

Nvidia and Palantir have pulled back from Anthropic over concerns about data, according to a Benzinga report. The report is brief and does not specify the scope or scale of the withdrawal.
The three companies sit at different points of the same AI supply chain. Nvidia is the dominant supplier of AI compute hardware, Palantir works with government and enterprise customers, and Anthropic is one of the leading model developers.
Data concerns point to one of the hardest parts of deploying AI in the enterprise. When models are connected to sensitive corporate environments, questions of retention, training use, and access rights become central terms of any partnership.
For Anthropic, simultaneous tightening by a hardware supplier and a significant customer could affect both resource access and revenue mix. For Nvidia and Palantir, the pullback would represent a more conservative position on compliance and data responsibility.
With so little public detail, causation should not be overstated. The report does not say whether the companies have issued statements, nor what specifically triggered the data concerns.
The signal to watch is whether any of the companies confirms or clarifies the report, and whether other enterprises begin re-examining the data boundaries they maintain with frontier model labs.
Why it matters
The episode suggests data governance is becoming a precondition for AI supply-chain partnerships, where even non-competing partners can slow collaboration over data terms. Any confirmation or denial from the companies involved would shape expectations for model vendors' data clauses.
Nearby Updates
All09/15, 00:27
Microsoft's new AI code of conduct tells models not to hack systems or trick humans
Microsoft has published an AI code of conduct that spells out how its models should behave, starting with a blunt rule: do not hack systems and do not trick humans. The document pairs broad principles, such as supporting humans rather than replacing them and accelerating human flourishing, with specific safety constraints meant to put those principles into practice.
09/15, 00:00
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Calls for an AI Slowdown
The New York Times reports that Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has publicly called for slowing the pace of AI development. Coming from the head of one of the leading frontier labs, the statement sharpens the tension between safety messaging and racing competition.
09/15, 00:00
AI agents blew the whistle on their cheating colleagues
In an experiment run by Google DeepMind, a group of AI agents asked to solve a series of math problems split into rival factions, and when some of them cheated, others tried to stop them. MIT Technology Review reports that this whistleblowing behavior was seen for the first time, with implications for alignment researchers trying to keep swarms of autonomous agents in check.
09/14, 23:00
Perplexity's Portable Computer Lands on Windows, Powered by NVIDIA RTX
On September 14 NVIDIA said Perplexity is bringing Portable Computer, the local version of its Perplexity Computer agent, to the Perplexity app for Windows on compatible GeForce RTX PCs and RTX PRO workstations. It runs multistep tasks on local models, keeps sensitive files on the device, and does not spend Perplexity Computer credits for work completed locally.