Realtime AI News
Chrome's AI-powered Autofill can now dig through your Gmail to fill out forms
Google is rolling out an advanced, AI-powered version of Chrome Autofill that can pull details such as flight confirmation numbers, order numbers and tracking information straight from a user's Gmail. The feature extends Google's Personal Intelligence work and is available to U.S. users on desktop and in the Gemini in Chrome apps for iOS and Android.

Google said on Wednesday that Chrome is getting an advanced, AI-powered version of Autofill that can pull details out of a user's Gmail inbox to complete online forms, rather than relying only on saved addresses and payment cards.
The suggestions can include a flight confirmation number, a membership ID, tracking information, an order number, an address, a phone number or a credit card number — details users would otherwise have to dig out of their email by hand.
The update extends Google's Personal Intelligence work, which already lets users connect Google apps to the Gemini assistant so it can retrieve details and answer more complex questions. The new step wires that inbox data into one of the browser's most routine actions.
As with other Personal Intelligence features, enhanced Autofill is opt-in: users can turn it on or off from Chrome settings, and Google says sensitive data is encrypted.
On its own the change looks minor, but it is a high-frequency one. It echoes an Apple feature users have long appreciated — detecting verification codes sent by text and offering them above the keyboard — by extending that no-manual-lookup convenience to longer forms and more kinds of information.
For Google the stakes are larger than saving a few copy-and-paste cycles. The browser is a gateway to Search and to Gemini, and the smoother form filling gets, the more reasons users have to stay inside Chrome and Google's AI ecosystem.
The feature is rolling out to U.S. users on the desktop and in the iOS and Android apps for Gemini in Chrome. Google has not said when other regions or additional account types will get it.
What to watch next is the granularity of control: whether users can authorize only certain categories of data, review and delete what was used, and how Google draws the line between convenience and privacy once inbox content flows into form filling.
Why it matters
Form filling is one of the browser's most frequent, least noticed actions, and handing it to AI means routing personal inbox data into everyday tasks. It reinforces Google's Gemini ecosystem at the browser layer, but it also sharpens questions about how many features get to read your email.
Nearby Updates
All10/29, 01:00
Google opens Gemini and Search to outside apps with Connected Apps Platform
Google launched the Connected Apps Platform on October 28, letting outside developers submit apps that work inside Gemini and Google Search. The preview, open to U.S. developers through a waitlist, uses MCP servers and AppFunctions APIs, with more than 50 apps already live in Gemini.
10/29, 01:06
Doubao denies claim that 150,000 extras' likenesses and voices trained its model
Doubao publicly denied a claim that the likenesses and voices of 150,000 film extras had been used to train a large model. The response puts the dispute over AI training data sourcing and performers' rights back in the spotlight.
10/29, 00:45
Ahead of Anthropic's IPO, Warren warns the AI giant could leave 'Americans holding the bag'
Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that Anthropic's move toward a public listing could leave "Americans holding the bag," according to a Common Dreams report published on Wednesday. The remark puts the politics of AI valuations and of who absorbs the downside in front of ordinary investors rather than founders and early backers.
10/29, 00:43
Anthropic's unreleased model chained flaws into working exploits for Chrome, Safari, Windows, Linux and Android
Anthropic's Frontier Red Team says an unreleased internal model found security flaws across Chrome, Safari, Android, Windows and Linux and chained them into working proof-of-concept exploits. Every flaw was reported to the vendor and patched first, and the exploits were built in the lab rather than observed in a real attack.