Realtime AI News
OpenAI Raises Bug Bounty Rewards, Adds Report Quality, Loyalty and Campaign Bonuses
OpenAI is raising its Security Bug Bounty rewards and introducing report quality, loyalty and priority campaign bonuses for independent security researchers. The new structure broadens how researchers can be paid beyond the size of a single vulnerability report.
OpenAI is increasing the rewards paid out through its Security Bug Bounty program and adding three new bonus categories for independent security researchers: report quality, researcher loyalty, and priority campaign bonuses.
Each category nudges behavior in a different direction. A report quality bonus rewards the craft of explaining a finding — taken at face value, the same vulnerability is worth more to defenders when it arrives with a clear description and a reproducible proof. A loyalty bonus targets researchers who keep coming back over time rather than filing once. Priority campaign bonuses are aimed at specific targets OpenAI wants attention on during a defined window.
Bug bounty programs are one of the main channels through which AI companies buy outside security expertise. A model provider's attack surface is oddly shaped — API surfaces, training and inference infrastructure, and the account systems around them — and no internal team covers every corner of it.
The timing is notable: on the same day, OpenAI also published a post on preparing its next internal security sprint with Cathedral Systems to test and harden its defenses using AI. Read together, the two moves describe a two-sided posture — drills on the inside, purchased findings on the outside.
Splitting rewards into quality, loyalty and campaign buckets also suggests bug bounties are moving from 'pay by severity' toward 'pay for research behavior.' For researchers, that changes how a program should be evaluated: the headline maximum matters less than the structure of the bonuses and how predictable payment is.
What to watch: whether OpenAI publishes new totals or a new top payout, which systems the priority campaigns point at, and whether other frontier labs adjust their own reward structures in response.
Why it matters
For independent researchers, paying for report quality and persistence rather than severity alone reshapes how time gets allocated across programs. For OpenAI, it is a repricing of the trade-off between disclosure cost and the supply of outside security research.
Nearby Updates
All11/03, 02:00
OpenAI Prepares Next Security Sprint With Cathedral Systems to Harden Defenses
OpenAI is preparing its next internal security sprint, with Cathedral Systems helping test and strengthen the company's defenses using AI. The work is presented as a recurring hardening exercise for OpenAI's own infrastructure rather than a one-off project.
11/03, 01:54
DeepSeek adds creator mode aimed at strengthening its AI agent tools
DeepSeek introduced a creator mode intended to strengthen its AI agent tools, Investing.com reported on November 2. The report places the update on the tooling side of the business, with few additional details in the headline and summary.
11/03, 02:46
SemiAnalysis launches GDPx, and the best models top out at 12%
SemiAnalysis has launched GDPx, a benchmark of 206 long-horizon tasks across 11 professional domains that tests how well frontier models actually complete agentic work. The strongest model, Claude Opus 5.5, reaches just 12%, and every model scores zero on the finance and legal tasks under binary grading.
11/03, 01:06
OpenAI says its AI is getting better at human everyday tasks like shopping and meal planning
OpenAI on Monday unveiled an internal tool for measuring how its models handle everyday human tasks and published research showing GPT-6 Astra, released in September, scored 93.1% on finding a kindergarten after a move and 98% on coordinating flood volunteers. On broader everyday-task prompts the model scored 80%, against 49.3% for GPT-5.2.